Administration In Crisis Over Burgeoning Quagmire
August 12, 1945
WASHINGTON,DC (Reuters) President Truman, just a few
months into his
young presidency, is coming under increasing fire from
some
Congressional Republicans for what appears to be a
deteriorating
security situation in occupied Germany, with some
calling for his
removal from office.
Over three months after a formal declaration of an end
to
hostilities, the occupation is bogged down. Fanatical
elements of the
former Nazi regime who, in their zeal to liberate
their nation from
the foreign occupiers, call themselves members of the
Werwolf
(werewolves) continue to commit almost-daily acts of
sabotage
against Germany's already-ravaged infrastructure, and
attack American
troops. They have been laying road mines, poisoning
food and water
supplies, and setting various traps, often lethal, for
the occupying
forces.
It's not difficult to find antagonism and
anti-Americanism among the
population--many complain of the deprivation and lack
of security.
There are thousands of homeless refugees, and
humanitarian efforts
seem confused and inadequate.
In the wake of the budding disaster, some have called
for more
international participation in peacekeeping.
A Red Cross official said that, "...the German
people will be more
comfortable if their conquerors weren't now their
overlords. It makes
it difficult to argue that this wasn't an
imperialistic war when the
occupying troops in the western sector are exclusively
American,
British and French."
The administration, of course, claims that, given the
chaos of the
recent war, such a situation is to be expected, and
that things will
improve with time. As to the suggestion to
internationalize the
occupying forces, the administration had no official
comment, but an
unofficial one was a repetition of the quote from
General McAuliffe,
when asked to surrender in last winter'sBattleof the
Bulge--"Nuts."
In an attempt to minimize the situation, a White House
spokesman
pointed out that the casualties were extremely light,
and militarily
inconsequential, particularly when compared to the
loss rates prior to
VE Day. Also, the attacks seem to be dying down with
each passing
month. But this statement was leaped upon by some as
heartless,
trivializing the deaths and injuries of young American
men.
Many critics back inWashingtonseem now to be
prescient, with their
previous warnings of just such an outcome a little
over a year ago.
One congressman said that "...it's time to ask
whether the German
people are better off now than they were a few months
ago. Yes, a
brutal dictator has been deposed, but at least the
electricity and
water supply were mostly working, and the trains
running on time.
After years of killing them and destroying their
infrastructure with
American bombs, it seems to me that the German people
have suffered
enough without the chaos that our occupation, with its
inadequate
policing, is bringing."
It's not clear how much support the Werwolf has among
the populace,
who may be afraid to speak their true minds, given the
fearfully
overwhelming "Allied" presence in the
country. But it is possible
that, like the guerilla forces themselves, the people
have been
inspired by Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels'
pre-victory
broadcasts, and those of Radio Werwolf.
"God has given up the protection of the people .
. . Satan has taken
command." Goebbels broadcast last spring.
"We Werewolves consider it
our supreme duty to kill, to kill and to kill,
employing every cunning
and wile in the darkness of the night, crawling,
groping through towns
and villages, like wolves, noiselessly,
mysteriously."
While no new broadcasts of Goebbels' voice have been
heard since
early May, no one can be certain as to whether he is
alive or dead,
and continuing to help orchestrate the attacks and
boost morale among
the forces for German liberation. As long as his fate,
and more
importantly, that of the former leader Adolf Hitler
himself, remains
unresolved, the prospects for pacifying the brutally
conquered country
may be dim.
Although Grand-Admiral Donitz made a radio
announcement of Hitler's
brave death in battle to the beleaguered German people
on the evening
of May 1, some doubt the veracity of that statement,
and there has
been no evidence to support it, or any body identified
as the former
Fuehrer's. Rumors of his whereabouts continue to
abound, including
reported sightings as far away asSouth America, and
many still believe
that he is hiding with the "Edelweiss"
organization, with thousands of
Wehrmacht troops, in a mountain stronghold near the
Swiss border.
Many have criticized flawed intelligence for our
failure to find him,
causing some, in the runup to next year's
congressional elections, to
call for an investigation.
A staffer of one prominent Senator said, "For
months, starting last
fall, we were told by this administration that Hitler
would make a
last stand in a 'National Redoubt' inBavaria. General
Bradley diverted
troops to the south and let the Russians takeBerlinon
the basis of
this knowledge. But now we find out that there was no
such place, and
that Hitler was inBerlinall along. And now we're told
that we can't
even be sure of where he is, or whether he's alive or
dead."
For many, marching in the streets with signs of
"No Blood For Soviet
Socialism," and "It's All About The
Coal," this merely confirmed that
the administration had other agendas than its stated
one, and that the
war was unjustified and unjustifiable.
General Bradley's staff has protested that this is an
unfair
criticism--that the strategic decision made by General
Eisenhower was
driven by many factors, of which Hitler's whereabouts
was a minor one,
but this hasn't silenced the critics, some of whom
have bravely called
for President Truman's impeachment, despite the fact
that most of
these decisions were made even before he became
president in April.
But some have taken the criticism further, and say
that failure to
get Hitler means a failed war itself.
"Sure, it's nice to have released all those
people from the
concentration camps, but we were told we were going to
war against
Hitler, even though he'd done nothing to us,"
argued one concerned
anti-war Senator. "Now they say that we have
'Victory inEurope,' but
it seems to me that if they can't produce the man we
supposedly went
to war against, it's a pretty hollow victory. Without
this man that
they told us was such a great threat to America, how
can even they
claim that this war was justified?"